FL and MI Redo?

As I said below, there are reports the MI will announce a caucus in the next few days. Look for the Clintons to flip-shit at the thought of a caucus. My guess is they are right now trying to kill it, for fear that such a caucus could kill them.

Hillary surrogate Sen Ben Nelson is calling for the DNC to pay for a re-vote, which the DNC has no plans to do. The history of both MI and FLA resulting in the loss of their delegates is long and sordid, with the DNC trying very hard to for solutions late last year and Democratic leaders from both states told them to pound sand (and don't believe those stories of the FL Dems being the victims of the GOP).

MI may do a caucus because it's much, much cheaper and easier to organize (you don't need all the voting machines and statewide and state owned infrastructure to count the votes.).

The Clintons to date have opposed a FL re-vote, and I'm speculating that a possible MI caucus is forcing them to re-think their position. A FL caucus makes much more sense than a very expensive state-wide re-vote in FL. FL isn't Rhode Island. The logical choice for FL, like MI, is a much less expensive party run caucus. But has the Clintons have made repeatedly clear, caucuses don't count.

The thought of MI and FL caucuses to seat their respective delegates amuses the hell out of me.